Quick Take
  • The eleven funds span diverse blockchain sectors, with each targeting a specific protocol.
  • Layer-2 scaling solutions feature prominently through the Bitwise STRK Strategy ETF for Starknet’s ZK-STARK technology.
  • Privacy-focused networks also appear via the Bitwise ZEC Strategy ETF, which tracks Zcash’s zk-SNARK implementation.
  • Bitwise Investment Manager serves as adviser across all funds, with portfolio management shared by Jennifer Thornton, Daniela Padilla, and Gayatri Choudhury.

What Happened

Bitwise Funds Trust filed registration statements with the SEC on December 30 for eleven strategy-based exchange-traded funds targeting major blockchain protocols, marking one of the largest single-day crypto ETF filings in industry history.

The funds, expected to become effective 75 days after filing, will trade on NYSE Arca and offer exposure to governance, utility, and native tokens through a hybrid investment structure combining direct holdings with European exchange-traded products.

The filing arrives as asset managers race to capture market share following the SEC’s October 2025 introduction of generic listing standards for crypto ETFs, which eliminated case-by-case approval requirements and accelerated product launches across the industry.

Each fund employs identical investment mechanics, with up to 60% in direct token holdings and at least 40% allocated to European ETPs that track token performance through fully collateralized debt securities.

Bitwise Investment Manager serves as adviser across all funds, with portfolio management shared by Jennifer Thornton, Daniela Padilla, and Gayatri Choudhury.

European ETP exposure introduces issuer default risk and valuation challenges due to time-zone differences between the U.S. and European markets.

Notably, the funds intend to qualify as Regulated Investment Companies, avoiding federal taxation at the fund level if income is distributed to shareholders.

The filing extends Bitwise’s aggressive ETF expansion following recent launches, including the Bitwise Dogecoin ETF, which has accumulated significant assets despite its non-1940 Act classification and reduced investor protections.

Market Context

Specialized protocols round out the suite, including the Bitwise TAO Strategy ETF for Bittensor’s AI marketplace, the Bitwise ENA Strategy ETF for Ethena’s synthetic dollar protocol, and funds covering Canton Network, Hyperliquid, and TRON blockchain.

Creation and redemption occur primarily through cash rather than in-kind transactions, potentially resulting in higher capital gains distributions than in traditional ETF structures.

Shares trade throughout the day at market prices that may deviate from net asset value.

Wave of Altcoin Products Reshapes ETF Landscape

Why It Matters

Despite the professional infrastructure, these products still carry significant risks.

Details

Bitwise Targets DeFi, Layer-2s, and Privacy Networks

The eleven funds span diverse blockchain sectors, with each targeting a specific protocol.

The Bitwise AAVE Strategy ETF focuses on decentralized lending, while the Bitwise UNI Strategy ETF tracks Uniswap’s decentralized exchange and Unichain Layer-2 network.

Infrastructure plays include the Bitwise NEAR Strategy ETF, which covers NEAR’s sharded architecture, and the Bitwise SUI Strategy ETF, which targets Mysten Labs’ Move-based blockchain.

Layer-2 scaling solutions feature prominently through the Bitwise STRK Strategy ETF for Starknet’s ZK-STARK technology.

Privacy-focused networks also appear via the Bitwise ZEC Strategy ETF, which tracks Zcash’s zk-SNARK implementation.

Funds maintain a minimum 80% exposure to designated tokens, related ETPs, and derivatives under normal conditions, with an optional 25% allocation to Cayman Islands subsidiaries for tax compliance and access to derivatives.

Institutional Access and Regulatory Complexity

The Bank of New York Mellon handles administration and custody for traditional securities, while Coinbase Custody Trust Company and BitGo Europe GmbH secure digital assets.

The funds operate under a unitary fee structure, though specific percentages remain undisclosed in the filing.

Regulatory uncertainty persists over whether tokens qualify as securities or commodities, with the potential for fund dissolution if classifications shift.